Thursday 10 July 2014

India gets a tail-end boost


Although they lost four quick wickets after lunch, India rode a last-wicket 111-run partnership to a position of strength.



England 43 for 1 trail India 457 (Vijay 146, Dhoni 82, Bhuvneshwar 58, Shami 51*) by 414 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details
India were in danger of surrendering the advantage they had built so carefully over four sessions as they lost four wickets for four runs immediately after lunch on the second day. But Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Mohammed Shami restored it with a 111-run last-wicket stand that punctured the fuel reserves of a frustrated England attack and extended India's total to 457.
Shami then dismissed Alastair Cook in the fourth over of England's reply, bowling the England captain round his legs as he walked too far across his stumps.
THE LAST STAND: Bhuvi and Shami after their effort.THE LAST STAND: Bhuvi and Shami after their effort.Over the remainder of the final session, India's seam bowlers searched for the right length to discomfit the notoriously front-foot-shy Sam Robson and Gary Ballance. They generally found themselves a touch shorter, but Ishant Sharma landed one in the perfect spot two overs from stumps only for the outside-edge from Ballance to drop a foot short of second slip. Ravindra Jadeja, who bowled two overs, showed he could be key later in the Test after he got one ball to explode out of rough at Ballance. England have three left-handers in their top six.
When India lost their ninth wicket, their survivors from the 2011 tour would have seen flashbacks of their collapse from 267 for 4 to 288 all out at the same venue. India had gone on to lose that Test match by 319 runs.
This England side, though, is different. Since the time Tino Best clobbered 95 against them two years ago, they have been hurt by numerous tail-end partnerships.
Bhuvneshwar farmed the strike in the first part of the partnership, but soon became confident of Shami's ability. England stuck gamely to a couple of self-consciously out-of-the-box plans: Liam Plunkett banging it in from around the wicket and James Anderson bowling full and straight with three close men from mid-on to midwicket. Neither plan perturbed the batsmen unduly.
The pair found the boundaries with a mixture of heaves and some surprisingly cultured shots, including an inside-out lofted drive by Bhuvneshwar off Moeen Ali and a clip off the pads from Shami off Anderson.
By the end of the session, England, forced into a mandatory half-hour extension, may have wished they had taken one wicket less than they had. Even when they did finally find the edge - as Hot Spot showed when Plunkett slanted one past Shami in the penultimate over of the session - only Alastair Cook appeared to hear the noise and the half-hearted appeals from the bowler and the keeper made no effect on the umpire.
Soon after tea, Bhuvneshwar reached his fifty, his first in Test cricket with an elegant drive to deep cover. Shami reached his maiden first-class fifty the next ball, clouting a full, wide ball back over Anderson's head for six. The partnership also breached the 100 mark with that shot.
With the third new ball around the corner, Cook brought on Moeen Ali for his 18th over. Bhuvneshwar nudged him to the brink of a bowling century with a drive back over his head for four, but fell trying to go even bigger the next ball, holing out to mid-on. The last-wicket pair had batted a minute over two-and-a-half hours.
Having patted their new-ball pair on their backs for their batting, India would have kicked themselves for surrendering so much initiative in so little time, right after lunch. They would have particularly rued the needlessly loose shots that led to the dismissals of Jadeja and Stuart Binny, their two allrounders. In between, MS Dhoni was run out by a direct hit from Anderson at mid-off.
At 346 for 9, England would not have believed how easy it had been, having toiled so hard with so little reward in the morning session. They could have earned a crack at the lower order much earlier though, had Matt Prior clung on to a chance that Dhoni offered 13 balls into the day. By the time Anderson broke through, sending back M Vijay, India's score had swelled from 263 at the time of the dropped catch to 304. By lunch, Dhoni had moved into the 80s, and had extended India's score by a further 38 runs in the company of Jadeja.
India's Mohammed Shami, right, and India's Bhuvneshwar Kumar leave the field of play after a partnership of 111 runs and India all out for 457 runs, during day two of the first Test between England ... more 
1 / 101
Associated Press | Photo by Rui Vieira
Dhoni began looking a lot more secure after early nervousness and adopeted an idiosyncratic shuffle across his crease to counter the low bounce and the lbw threat.
At the other end, Vijay moved to 146 with a number of good-looking drives through the off side before Anderson dismissed him with a ball that nipped back from outside off to strike him on the back thigh. Bruce Oxenford took his time before raising his finger, but it was one of those lbws that justlook out. On this pitch, barely anything from that length was bouncing over the stumps anyway. Hawk-Eye suggested it was going over, but Hawk-Eye's square-on view also suggested, erroneously, that the ball had struck Vijay in front of the crease.
ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Tuesday 8 July 2014

A test for two rebuilding teams


Five Tests in the next six weeks will test England's character as severely as India's.


Alastair Cook and MS Dhoni eye the trophy on the eve of the Test series. (Reuters)

Match facts
July 9-13, 2014
Start time 1100 local (1000 GMT)

Big Picture
Just under three years ago, most of the talk was about milestones heading into India's tour of England. The 2000th Test. The 100th Test between England and India. Sachin Tendulkar's 100th international hundred. Duncan Fletcher's 100th Test as coach. All of it at the traditional home of cricket. Cricket watchers besotted by statistics have driven themselves into frenzy over far less. To expect the quality of cricket to match the sense of occasion was fair, what with two of the world's top sides vying for the No 1 ranking.
Instead, Zaheer Khan limped out of the series on the first day, and India's ageing band of legendary batsmen - Rahul Dravid apart - followed him in spirit. MS Dhoni had entered the series having not lost a single one before. Four embarrassments later, two of them by an innings, he had presided over a winless overseas run that has extended to this day and has lasted 14 Tests.
Fortunately for the Indians, only five of that squad are on this trip. Virat Kohli and Wriddhiman Saha had no role on the field then, and Gautam Gambhir may not have a significant one this time. It is not in Dhoni's nature to carry baggage - good or bad - around, and if Ishant Sharma can survive that bowling average after 55 Tests, he can survive anything.
It has been said before, but it is worth repeating before the start of this series. This is not the India side that suffered the humiliation of 0-8 in England and Australia, it is the side that came close to winning a Test on each of its first two tours to South Africa and New Zealand. In 2011, India averaged 255 over eight innings in England. In its first seven overseas innings, this team already averages nearly 325.
India may or may not have the ability to take 20 wickets, but they have the potential to put a decent score on the board, a total which it makes it difficult for the opposition to force a result. The previous Indian Test team achieved what it did partly because it had the batsmen who often made big runs under pressure, but they failed to collectively score in excess of 300 even once in England 2011. The current lot cannot possibly do worse. Given the way English pitches behaved recently against Sri Lanka, there is every chance they will do better. That in itself will make it a contest, unlike 2011.
As will the absence of several big names on the English side from last time - Kevin Pietersen, Jonathan Trott, Andrew Strauss and Graeme Swann. The first of those names started the series in 2011 with an unbeaten 202 and ended with 175. England have started on the path of rebuilding after the Ashes whitewash and have found there will be plenty of heartburn along the way, as the series loss to Sri Lanka has shown. Just a fortnight later, five Tests in the next six weeks will test England's character as severely as India's. Zero-eight eventually ended a couple of big careers for India, and the loss at home to England in 2012 nudged a couple more towards their exit. There won't be too many surprises if this one also claims a scalp or two.

Form guide
(last five completed matches, most recent first)
England LDLLL
India DLLDW

In the spotlight
Amid apprehensions that the Indians could be blown away by Dale Steyn and co, Virat Kohli made a century so emphatic in his first innings in South Africa that Allan Donald was reminded of Sachin Tendulkar. He made 96 in the second, and while he was dominating in Auckland, the Indians threatened to hunt down 400-plus. He went on to make another hundred in Wellington. With 25 international centuries, Kohli has reached a stage where he is the team's most prized wicket. If India intend to make a statement at the start of the series, Kohli is the man to do it.
Alastair Cook's position as England captain has never been under as much scrutiny. Cook, and for that matter any batsman, thrives on runs, and there is a case that runs will make the captaincy much more manageable. The runs have not been coming; Cook has gone 25 innings without a century. He averages 55-plus against India, though, and his highest score of 294 came against them in 2011. Friendly, familiar opposition could be Cook's ticket to safety.

Teams' news
England had named Jos Buttler as wicketkeeping cover for Matt Prior, who experienced "mild tightness" in his right thigh two days before the Test but Cook later said that Prior was "almost certain" to play. They had earlier added allrounder Ben Stokes to the squad, and he is likely to come in for Chris Jordan, who went wicketless in the second Test against Sri Lanka.
England (possible): 1 Alastair Cook (capt), 2 Sam Robson, 3 Gary Ballance, 4 Ian Bell, 5 Joe Root, 6 Moeen Ali, 7 Matt Prior (wk), 8 Ben Stokes, 9 Stuart Broad, 10 Liam Plunkett, 11 James Anderson
India had given indications that they could hand Stuart Binny a Test debut ahead of Rohit Sharma, which shows a rare intent to step out of their comfort zone in search for those elusive 20 wickets. This will, of course, make the batting thinner, with even more responsibility on Dhoni at No. 6. Bhuvneshwar Kumar could be playing his first overseas Test.
India (possible): 1 M Vijay, 2 Shikhar Dhawan, 3 Cheteshwar Pujara, 4 Virat Kohli, 5 Ajinkya Rahane, 6 MS Dhoni (capt & wk), 7 Stuart Binny, 8 Ravindra Jadeja, 9 Bhuvneshwar Kumar, 10 Mohammed Shami, 11 Ishant Sharma

Pitch and conditions
This may be James Anderson's favourite venue but the Trent Bridge curator does not want teams bowled out for 180. There will be bounce as the surface is hard but movement will depend on how much grass - dry and brown - is left on the pitch. The surface is hard but without much moisture beneath. As always in England, overhead conditions will play a key role. The first day is forecast to be cloudy, with some rain expected over the next four days.

Stats and trivia
  • Among their six major Test venues, England have the poorest win-loss ratio at Trent Bridge
  • James Anderson has as many five-fors in seven Tests at Trent Bridge as he has in 46 matches in all other grounds in England together - six. For more stats on Trent Bridge, see this.
  • India's previous Test win in England came at Trent Bridge in 2007. Dhoni is the only remnant of that XI in this squad

Quotes
"If I compare between the first Test we played in South Africa and the last Test we played in New Zealand there has been considerable improvement. You know, it's the right way of moving ahead."
India captain MS Dhoni
"I think playing a domestic game as a warm-up is a very, very different thing to playing a Test match. Certainly Duncan Fletcher always viewed them as warm-ups - that's how we did it when he was coach - so I wouldn't read too much into what happened."
England captain Alastair Cook is not lulled into a false sense of security seeing how India's bowlers went in Derby and Leicester


ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Monday 7 July 2014

India look for their Indian summer


India are looking for that period of warmth, redemption after the last whitewash, for they have seen how bleak the winter that can follow is.


Duncan Fletcher and MS Dhoni have a tough task ahead of themselves. (Getty Images)
"What's the score?" "One more gone?" [Laughter]
On January 17, 2012, India should have been playing tough Test cricket on the hard surface of the WACA Ground in Perth. They were not. Having been rolled over inside three days - their seventh successive overseas Test defeat - India rested on what would have been the fourth, trained on the fifth, and were back in the hotel by the time England's Test against Pakistan began in faraway Dubai.
The cricket was either not on TV or the players were going through their team exercises - gym and pool sessions, individual and team meetings etc. A few journalists were working in the team hotel's foyer. Every few minutes a player would pop out to ask for the score in Dubai, and be informed of another fallen wicket as England went from 31 for 1 to 43 for 5 to 94 for 7 and eventually 192 all out on the first day. There was visible pleasure on their faces. From little things big things grow.
Five days later, during India's next press conference in Australia, came their first cry for turning pitches when England and Australia would tour later in the year. Such moments were the lowest point of India's miserable run away from home.
Why are we still talking of the dark days during a lovely start to the English summer with days long and birds atwitter?
Because England matters. Of late England have been a bogey team for India in Tests. They have won three of the last five Tests that India have lost at home, they began the process of unravelling the strong Indian side in 2011, and three each of the five most successful batsmen and bowlers against India since 2011 have been Englishmen. Players of the 2011 Indian team must still be going to shrinks to deal with the recurring nightmares of long days in the field when nothing happened with the ball only for it to become unplayable when they batted.
In the recent past, more often than not, India have had to do with schadenfreude when it comes to England. Now that they are back in England, India have been provided ingredients for more schadenfreude. Around the time they were getting measured for final alterations on their tour blazers, the India players would have heard of the meltdown the England captain Alastair Cook had while responding to Shane Warne's criticism of his "boring" and "defensive" captaincy. By the time they were sipping their first Earl Greys or India Pale Ales, England had lost a home Test series to Sri Lanka.
No laughter this time, though. Not in public at least. Instead of turning the screw through some kind of mental disintegration, India have chosen to stay low key, which is usually their way unless they are rattled or the inimitable Virender Sehwag is at press conferences. The first signs point to a calm team quietly hopeful and confident. They know this is a good chance for a young group, which came awfully close to winning Tests in South Africa and New Zealand, to finally put one, and then more, on the board.
That confidence must arise from a promising batting line-up as much as it does from England's disintegration. The hosts are in disarray, similar to what India went through when England toured India in 2012-13. Like then with India, the ruthless whitewash in Australia has claimed careers, and has left the hosts vulnerable. Consequently India's batting is more stable than England's, less likely to play weak shots to get out as they showed in their two previous trips, although they are bound to be less familiar with the conditions. However, they also know that Sri Lanka's attack had the England batting in trouble in both Tests; India's bowling is not exactly worse than Sri Lanka's. There is cause for optimism, but there is no way India are considering themselves favourites.
This whole tour is a vast unknown for India. Most of them have played, and done well in, ODI cricket in England, but only three - MS Dhoni, Ishant Sharma and Gautam Gambhir - of the 18-member squadhave played a Test here. Only four - M Vijay being the other - have tasted Test success away from home. India last won an away Test just before going to England in 2011. None of them has ever played a five-Test series, though questions over longevity are being asked of England too, what with Sri Lanka proving stubborn, pitches good for batting, and seven Tests to be played in the summer. India's stock bowler, their workhorse, and also their most experienced one, boasts one of the worst records for any bowler who has lasted 50 Tests. Their captain has had tactics questioned, and has been labelled defensive, more often than his counterpart.
With the unknown comes the beauty of possibility. It's almost a clean slate for a majority of this team. If they see an England partnership developing, they are less likely to think, "Here we go again." The Indian newcomers of today aren't the newcomers of the '90s and before. They are confident, combative, aware, privileged with the best of facilities and finances, and do not build pressure on themselves by putting a tour on a pedestal.
And within that unknown, the India players are pretty certain of their roles, which will not change much from what they were in South Africa and New Zealand. Vijay will look to fight at the top with the discipline he scarcely gets credit for, Shikhar Dhawan will try to impose himself; Cheteshwar Pujara will play his usual game while Virat Kohli will look to take it to the opposition if he manages to get in; Rohit Sharma and Ajinkya Rahane will have to get runs with the lower-middle and lower order.
Bowling has always been India's worry, and will continue to be. This is where India can be hurt. This is the first time in a long time they have embarked on a big tour without their de facto bowling captain, Zaheer Khan, who would have been fit midway during the series. Picking someone not fit right then and there is a mistake they were not going to repeat after 2011. Over the last two trips, the bowlers have inspired to an extent and against the odds; now they will need to make it a bit of a norm. They can't afford for the intensity to drop in - at 42 days from start to finish - the most compressed five-Test series England has ever hosted.
Bhuvneshwar Kumar will try to do what Praveen Kumar did on the last trip: swing the ball, either way, and look for edges. Mohammed Shami will be the impact man, looking to bowl fast and get seam movement. India will look to use him in short, sharp bursts. Ishant will have to do the donkey's work when the shine on the ball has worn off. Rangana Herath's success in the first part of the summer might just have tipped the scales in favour of Ravindra Jadeja to start ahead of R Ashwin. India haven't looked shy of experimenting with an extra bowler, but there is time to go before Stuart Binny is handed his Test cap.
The most important role - though he won't admit it and invite extra pressure - will be that of the captain Dhoni. He has won all there is to win in limited-overs cricket, but the last two Test tours to England and Australia have to rankle. Try as he might to keep the idea of legacy from clouding his current state of mind, the competitor in him will want to correct this record. More so because there were instances on both tours when India let Test matches drift in the field, something that can be pinned as much on the captain as on the bowlers. He has a younger and more athletic bunch in the field, which he has always sought, but they are also poorer in the slips. To manage with these bowling resources, not in limited-overs cricket with finite possibilities, but over a gruelling five-Test series with all its infiniteness, will be a stern test of Dhoni's captaincy.
Here in England, headlines and billboards are calling this series England's Indian Summer. Some of their players might have, to borrow from The Doors' Indian Summer, loved India the best, "better than all the rest", but it is India who are looking for that late period of warmth, a bit of redemption after the last whitewash. They don't want Anderson and Broad, and Bell and Cook to love them better than the rest. They need their own Indian Summer, for they have known how bleak and full of agony the winter that can follow is.
ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Sunday 6 July 2014

A celebration of cricket and tradition


The cricket was the centerpiece at Lord's, as players and spectators celebrated the 200th anniversary of a ground steeped in tradition.

There was a kid standing in the queue, shaking his legs impatiently, just like kids do when they want something. Standing in one of the tunnels, this kid - an Indian - waited with his dad to enter the Mound Stand. In one hand he held a box of chicken wings, in the other some sauce sachets and a wooden fork. As he nibbled on his food, suddenly the most famous chant in cricket rang around Lord's: "Sachin, Sachin." The kid stared at his dad in disbelief, wondering why he was not being allowed to watch Tendulkar bat.
This is Lord's, though, and here the stewards politely ask you to wait and enter the stands only at the end of an over. It does not matter that it is Tendulkar batting, it would not have mattered had it been Don Bradman batting. At Lord's, a ground steeped in discipline, history and greatness, decorum is of utmost importance.
Lord's 200th anniversary was a celebration of its greatness, and great players like Tendulkar, Brian Lara, Rahul Dravid, Muttiah Muralitharan, Shane Warne, Adam Gilchrist and Shivnarine Chanderpaul. It was the only reason all these great players had been assembled by the MCC, the owners of the ground.
Two hundred years old. The grand old tree of cricket has stayed strong and its roots, steeped in tradition, have only grown deeper. The ground has been witness to great matches, legendary players and turning points in the history of the game. It was fitting that this match was a sell-out and that the crowd was undeterred by the drizzle on a chilly Saturday.
According to an MCC official, though tickets for the match were on sale well in advance, about 7500 were unsold until a couple of months ago. As soon as the squads were unveiled, however, and "Sachin and Dravid" featured in them, the remaining tickets sold within six hours.
Walking out of the crowded St John's Wood tube station in the morning and along packed pavements, it was hard to gauge the context of this match. Nothing was at stake. Yet people lined up obediently outside various gates with their food boxes, Pimms and wine. Some members had started queuing from 6am though the gates opened only three hours later. Dads wheeled pushchairs back and forth as toddlers napped. Tickets worth £50 reportedly went for £500 in the afternoon.
For a journalist it was an exhibition game, yet to the fan the buzz and the sense of excitement was unique. When Tendulkar hit his first boundary, a classical back-foot square drive, many fans in the Mound Stand - irrespective of nationality - stood up and applauded as the ball beat a diving Tino Best. When Best bounced Tendulkar, the same crowd gave the bowler a warning. One of the uniqueness of watching cricket at Lord's is the intimacy the ground allows between the player and the crowd.
Over the decades the MCC has worked hard to preserve the traditions of the game: its ethics, values and the spirit of cricket. The Long Room, the museum and the library embody those virtues. Events like today, though ceremonial in nature, carry a lot of meaning. An 81-year-old MCC member, walked into the library and told the chief librarian Neil Robinson about having watched the likes of Bradman and Wally Hammond as a teenager. "He told me today it was so exciting to see some of the biggest names in cricket on the scorecard," Robinson says.
Ask Robinson why this game had such importance, and he points to how dear the occasion is to the players. "You just have to look at Tendulkar and Warne, who could never get on the Honours Board, but still wanted to come and play and show what this game means to them."
Next to the Pavilion is a tiny path that people in wheelchairs use to get into the ground. Sitting in his wheelchair Ian Basnett, a 55-year-old doctor, patiently waits to get in. Basnett is paralysed neck down because of an injury sustained playing rugby 29 years ago. A doctor by profession, he has been watching cricket from 1975. "I have experienced some wonderful days at Lord's. The staff here are incredibly accommodating compared to everywhere else," Basnett says, as a steward lets him know the cricket has resumed after a rain break.
MCC's captain Sachin Tendulkar smiles as Rest of the World's Yuvraj Singh attempts to grab his leg during a cricket match to celebrate 200 years of Lord's at Lord's cricket ground in London, July 5, ... more 
1 / 31
Reuters | Photo by PHILIP BROWN / REUTERS
The respect between fans and caretakers is evident in the adjacent Warner Stand. This stand is more reserved, its occupants - many quintessential public school types - are quiet in celebration. When Tendulkar punches a cover drive for four, a ten-year old boy stands and waves his hands to signal a boundary. Such fanfare gets a disapproving nod and a stare from a middle-aged MCC member, wearing the egg and bacon tie with binoculars around his neck.
Jashwantrai Tanna, 75, has been an MCC steward for 19 years. Today he carried his appointment letter - wrapped in plastic - with the date - April 13, 1996 - to show some of his colleagues who were skeptical about his tenure. Minutes later Tendulkar, trying to play a cheeky steer against Muttiah Muralitharn, is bowled. Tanna rushes to the front of the stand to pay his respects. Lord's is up on its feet for a standing ovation. It is rousing. Tendulkar waves goodbye. In walks Lara. The crowd is still on its feet. The celebration continues.
ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

'We know we are capable of performing anywhere'


Pujara about his preparation for England, T20 lessons, and Fletcher's contribution

Do you believe you are India's best current Test batsman?
'In South Africa we did reasonably well.''In South Africa we did reasonably well.'I don't want to compare or rate myself because cricket has always been a team game and I do not want to say I am the best. Obviously there are many responsibilities, which I totally understand. There are also so many expectations because of the way I have performed in the last one and a half years. I know that I am capable of scoring big runs. I just want to continue the good form rather than worry about whether I am the best or not, which will help both my career as well as India's progress in the forthcoming series.
India are playing a five-Test series for the first time after 12 years. How daunting is that a task for this Indian team?
It will be a challenging tour. No doubt about that, because we did not play well on the previous tour in 2011. That will be at the back of our minds. But there are more positives now. Our batsmen have played the likes of Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel in South Africa, where we did reasonably well. A couple of sessions did not go our way, otherwise we could have won that series. But overall we had a good tour of South Africa. Then, earlier this year in New Zealand, I did not make runs, but I did get starts. I did feel I was in good touch and I was happy despite not getting big runs. Those two tours will help me and other Indian batsmen perform better in England.
In England we expect the pitches to behave better compared to what we faced in South Africa and New Zealand. Also, most of the Indian players have already been to England in the past so they are aware of the conditions, in contrast to South Africa and New Zealand, where we did not have previous playing experience.
The wounds of the 4-0 whitewash of the 2011 tour have not yet been erased. What will be the key for India to do well this time around?
It is self-belief. Having played overseas we now know we are capable of performing anywhere. It is a confident unit now. The 2011 Indian batch was a mix of seniors and juniors. Now it is mostly young players, so our communication is really good. I'm not saying the communication was not there in 2011, but when you have seniors [in the squad] you tend to learn from them and speak to them accordingly. Now we try and share our experiences. We share a lot of information. For example I often go to Murali Vijay and Shikhar Dhawan and share my inputs and at the same time ask them for their insights. So the communication is easier and that is the key for this Indian team's success. It can save you a wicket or help you take a wicket.
Do you think India will be more confident this time around considering England are themselves a different team, with a new coach, a new batting order, and a bowling attack without Graeme Swann?
It will make a huge difference for them. We obviously will not worry about what their side will be. But when you have players just coming into the team and experienced players like Swann not being there, the combination changes that might affect them. Playing at home is still an advantage for England, but you can't deny the fact that changing the combination might make things difficult for them.
What about James Anderson - do you consider him one of the most dangerous bowlers?
He is dangerous. It is all about experience and he has that. He knows where to bowl, what length to pitch on, and which end to pick. He is a clever bowler. He might be the bowler for us to watch out for.
You are known to prepare diligently ahead of every overseas tour. How are you trying to fight the seaming conditions in England?
The good thing is I have already played in the UK, having toured there with the India A team in 2010. So I have a little bit of an idea of how the pitches might behave. But it all depends on the weather conditions. There are so many changes one can experience in England. If it is sunny, the ball might not swing much but it can still seam. My father is already thinking about preparing pitches that might offer more seam movement. I am also trying to find balls that will swing around more than the normal ones do. So we will try and mix it up, which will simulate the movement as far as possible. I have heard that in the UK there is not as much seam movement compared to South Africa and New Zealand. So swing is something I will be working on to get myself prepared. I have also spoken to some of the Australian players in the Kings XI Punjab squad about playing in foreign conditions and how pitches behave and what they feel is the key to succeed.
England showed they were dangerous even in India. You were the second-highest run-maker in that series. But England came back from their pounding in the first Test in Ahmedabad to win the series 2-1. How much did it hurt to lose at home?
It was really disappointing. We wanted to beat England badly, keeping the 2011 defeat in mind. But ultimately you have to appreciate the way they played. Things turned around for England from the second Test in Mumbai. I thought we were in a very good position having scored 375-odd runs. But the partnership between Alastair Cook and Kevin Pietersen proved to be the turning point of the series. Everybody should appreciate the way those two batted because it was not an easy pitch. After they won that Test England felt they had the confidence and they carried forward the momentum to win the series. Overall India competed really well but you have to give credit to England.
Although he is retired now Kevin Pietersen has left some stirring memories. What do you admire about him?
He is a fearless cricketer. The kind of shots he plays, like the switch hit and the reverse sweep, require a lot of practice. I have been working on those kind of strokes in the nets and I can tell you it is not easy to play. Pietersen's preparation and work ethic are tremendous. He is spontaneous, because I have noticed him change his stroke even as the ball is halfway down the pitch. He could be thinking of playing the sweep shot but if he spots the ball landing outside the off stump he can switch-hit the ball over cover, which is impossible to many other batsmen.
But there is one other guy who has done similar stuff: Glenn Maxwell, who was your Kings XI Punjab team-mate…
Maxwell is similarly spontaneous and, like Pietersen, he too prepares really well. He plays the reverse sweep, switch hit, and scoop so many times in the nets. He has mastered it to the extent that he can take his decision just as the bowler is releasing the ball. He can change his plan impromptu. At times he has pre-planned strokes for certain type of deliveries and against particular bowlers. But Pietersen has done it in Tests and ODIs, not just the IPL. Perhaps Maxwell could do the same in the future. He is capable of it.
Did the explosive trio of Maxwell, David Miller and Virender Sehwag actually distract you, a more classical and technically correct batsman?
I have a role to play in the IPL team where I do not need to go at a strike rate of 150 and above. That is the job for these three guys and they are capable of doing that in any situation. I have to play to my strengths and that allows me to play normal cricketing strokes and score 40-odd runs in 30-odd balls. I do not think they distract me at all. My role is very well-defined. I play the game the way I know best.
To the fans outside the subcontinent you are the odd one out among India's glitzy batting order. You do not have the same visible swagger of a Kohli, Dhawan, Rohit or Raina. Are you the odd one out?
People have formed an impression of me, that I am capable of playing the Test format. Steadily I have started performing in ODIs also and now people think I can play in that format also. With time, and with my hard work and work ethic, I think I will be able to catch up with T20s too. But I will need some time. T20 is somethingI am still learning. In India we do not play too many T20s in domestic cricket. Before the IPL I had just played four T20 matches. The more I play in the IPL, the better I will become. At the moment I am really happy the way things are going with my Test career. I spoke to the Indian team management and they are looking for me to be part of the ODI set-up.
As for my personality, I am not a flamboyant person. But personality is a totally different thing altogether. I like things to be simple. My job is to play cricket and I enjoy playing the game. Otherwise I lead a simple life.
Is there something a batsman like you can take from the T20 format into your Test batting?
One thing that will help me in the Tests is, if I'm batting with the tail and the situation demands that we accelerate, I will be able to switch gears much better now. In Test cricket most of the fielders are inside the ring so I can play shots with freedom. But apart from that, it is a different ball, different conditions, and the strategies are different between T20 and Tests.
Due to the success of the IPL the outside world is always doubting whether young Indians are bothered at all about Test cricket. You entered the Indian team based on your first-class performances. Can you talk about where you place Test cricket?
I love Test cricket. It is the ultimate format in the game. I have had the opportunity to speak toSachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Virender Sehwag, Ricky Ponting, AB de Villiers and all of them agree Test cricket is the most challenging and [the format] which every player loves to play. I am no exception. One good thing is I am very good at it. Test matches will always be a priority for me as your cricketing skills are always tested when you play in different conditions and different situations. So it is not an easy job - to be part of the Test team and be successful.
This is the first year India are playing without Tendulkar. What is it like to be part of the next generation: daunting or inspiring?
One of the things Sachin paaji told me was: We are here to serve the nation and serve the game of cricket. People have expectations from us and we are always working hard to become successful. But India has a lot of young players in this team and it might take us some time to be successful, especially overseas. But most of the players in this current Indian team have played with legends like Tendulkar and Dravid, who shared their experiences and provided tips on how to succeed across all formats at the international level. So those interactions are bound to be useful for us. But I admit it is a challenging task. When the team does not have any experienced players then I have to be more responsible.
When I made my debut I was just a youngster, and people looked at me as someone who was coming up. But now when I go in to bat the same people have a lot of expectations. So there are more responsibilities for me now. But that only makes you a better player. It makes you realise your wicket is really important. It makes you realise you have a responsibility not just for yourself but for the team and the entire country.
It must be good to have a veteran like Duncan Fletcher as the Indian coach. How has he helped the young India batsmen?
One thing Duncan has always maintained is he never touches or changes a player's basics. He understands technique and temperament. He just fine-tunes few aspects if need be. He never forces a player to do anything or change something dramatically. He keeps the players comfortable and talks to them and leaves it to him to decide what to do. That way he manages to keep the player in his comfort zone.
He is very innovative. He realises that the game is changing and the kind of strategies he has are very helpful. For example in one-day cricket there are five fielders inside the circle now, so he has strategies for batsmen for the areas he can target as well as the areas the bowler will focus on to make use of that field.
Duncan's experience with the England team in the past has helped him handle the Indian team better. Based on his rich coaching experience overseas he can share various things that can only be helpful for us. England were on top when he was with them and he has shared stuff with us that made them better.
Life as an Indian cricketer is completely different from what other international players go through. Everyone says they block it out, but is it really possible to ignore the clamour?
It has become difficult. Earlier when I played for Saurashtra I could do what I want and roam the streets. As an Indian cricketer I cannot do it anymore. So privacy is difficult. But on the positive front the fans admire and praise you and follow you closely. I lead a simple life and my focus has always been on the game. Thanks to my parents, especially my father, who was a first-class cricketer - that helped me a lot with my game. He has helped me become the person I am. Even though it is difficult to keep my professional life and personal life separate I have managed to do that and I hope to be the same person that I am now.
Are you taking your dad to Lord's? What are your own feelings of playing there?
I have told him [to come] but he likes to watch the game on television where he can notice every small thing. He told me he will be more comfortable continuing to do that rather being at the ground and getting distracted.
It will be really exciting to play at Lord's where I have dreamed of playing a Test match from my childhood. But one thing is certain: my focus will be on the game once I'm on the field. I won't be nervous. I won't be very excited, because ultimately I am playing cricket. So I have to handle myself and be balanced about what I have to do for team India. As an individual, that is my responsibility.
ESPN Sports Media Ltd.